MBOF
Price
$38.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
71.17M
OAKV
Price
$13.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
47.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBOF vs OAKV

Header iconMBOF vs OAKV Comparison
Open Charts MBOF vs OAKVBanner chart's image
Marine Bancorp of Florida
Price$38.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization71.17M
OAK VIEW BANKSHARES
Price$13.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.61K
Capitalization47.41M
MBOF vs OAKV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OAKV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBOF vs. OAKV commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBOF is a Hold and OAKV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MBOF: $38.93 vs. OAKV: $13.60)
Brand notoriety: MBOF and OAKV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBOF: 62% vs. OAKV: 232%
Market capitalization -- MBOF: $71.17M vs. OAKV: $47.41M
MBOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $71.17M. OAKV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOAKV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OAKV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OAKV is a better buy in the long-term than MBOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OAKV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OAKV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBOF and OAKV are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OAKV (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.18% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBOF($71.2M) has a higher market cap than OAKV($47.4M). MBOF YTD gains are higher at: -2.675 vs. OAKV (-7.085).
MBOFOAKVMBOF / OAKV
Capitalization71.2M47.4M150%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.675-7.08538%
P/E Ratio25.12N/A-
RevenueN/A9.28M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBOF vs OAKV: Fundamental Ratings
MBOF
OAKV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3129
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1246
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OAKV's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MBOF (84). This means that OAKV’s stock grew similarly to MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

OAKV's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBOF (100). This means that OAKV’s stock grew significantly faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

OAKV's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBOF (100). This means that OAKV’s stock grew significantly faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

OAKV's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as MBOF (73). This means that OAKV’s stock grew similarly to MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

MBOF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OAKV (46). This means that MBOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OAKV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBOFOAKV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
3%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OAKV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAYZF32.330.53
+1.67%
Bayer A.G.
BYYLF0.37N/A
N/A
Balyo SA
FLUIF28.29N/A
N/A
Fluidra SA
SQZZF2.05N/A
N/A
Serica Energy Plc
BVAXD0.19-0.02
-10.61%
BioVaxys Technology Corp.

MBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBOF has been loosely correlated with OAKV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBOF jumps, then OAKV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBOF
1D Price
Change %
MBOF100%
N/A
OAKV - MBOF
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLMIF - MBOF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RCBC - MBOF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AFNL - MBOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
PSTVY - MBOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OAKV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OAKV has been loosely correlated with MBOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OAKV jumps, then MBOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OAKV
1D Price
Change %
OAKV100%
N/A
MBOF - OAKV
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RCBC - OAKV
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - OAKV
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMIF - OAKV
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LLAZF - OAKV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More