MBOF
Price
$38.90
Change
-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
71.12M
PSTVY
Price
$14.90
Change
+$1.11 (+8.05%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
94.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBOF vs PSTVY

Header iconMBOF vs PSTVY Comparison
Open Charts MBOF vs PSTVYBanner chart's image
Marine Bancorp of Florida
Price$38.90
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Volume$2.35K
Capitalization71.12M
Postal Svgs Bk of China
Price$14.90
Change+$1.11 (+8.05%)
Volume$12.81K
Capitalization94.68B
MBOF vs PSTVY Comparison Chart in %
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSTVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBOF vs. PSTVY commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBOF is a Hold and PSTVY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MBOF: $38.90 vs. PSTVY: $14.90)
Brand notoriety: MBOF and PSTVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBOF: 578% vs. PSTVY: 251%
Market capitalization -- MBOF: $71.12M vs. PSTVY: $94.68B
MBOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $71.12M. PSTVY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $94.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSTVY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PSTVY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSTVY is a better buy in the long-term than MBOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSTVY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PSTVY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSTVY is a better buy in the short-term than MBOF.

Price Growth

MBOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while PSTVY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.06% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSTVY($94.7B) has a higher market cap than MBOF($71.1M). MBOF has higher P/E ratio than PSTVY: MBOF (25.10) vs PSTVY (6.63). PSTVY YTD gains are higher at: 27.912 vs. MBOF (-2.750).
MBOFPSTVYMBOF / PSTVY
Capitalization71.1M94.7B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.75027.912-10%
P/E Ratio25.106.63379%
RevenueN/A234B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBOF vs PSTVY: Fundamental Ratings
MBOF
PSTVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSTVY's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as MBOF (84). This means that PSTVY’s stock grew similarly to MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

PSTVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBOF (100). This means that PSTVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

PSTVY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBOF (100). This means that PSTVY’s stock grew significantly faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

PSTVY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MBOF (73). This means that PSTVY’s stock grew similarly to MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

MBOF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PSTVY (25). This means that MBOF’s stock grew similarly to PSTVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBOFPSTVY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSTVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KVAC11.60N/A
N/A
Keen Vision Acquisition Corp
SUI126.16-1.34
-1.05%
Sun Communities
PUMP5.44-0.07
-1.27%
ProPetro Holding Corp
BEAM25.13-0.76
-2.94%
Beam Therapeutics
ISPC0.97-0.14
-12.93%
iSpecimen Inc

MBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBOF has been loosely correlated with OAKV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBOF jumps, then OAKV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBOF
1D Price
Change %
MBOF100%
N/A
OAKV - MBOF
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLMIF - MBOF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RCBC - MBOF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
AFNL - MBOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSTVY - MBOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PSTVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSTVY and CIHKY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSTVY and CIHKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSTVY
1D Price
Change %
PSTVY100%
N/A
CIHKY - PSTVY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
HSNGY - PSTVY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
CHCJY - PSTVY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBOF - PSTVY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSZKY - PSTVY
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
More