MBPFF
Price
$3.05
Change
-$0.69 (-18.45%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
NROM
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.03 (-7.50%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

MBPFF vs NROM

Header iconMBPFF vs NROM Comparison
Open Charts MBPFF vs NROMBanner chart's image
Mitchells & Butlers
Price$3.05
Change-$0.69 (-18.45%)
Volume$275
CapitalizationN/A
Noble Roman's
Price$0.37
Change-$0.03 (-7.50%)
Volume$418
CapitalizationN/A
MBPFF vs NROM Comparison Chart
Loading...
MBPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NROM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBPFF vs. NROM commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBPFF is a Hold and NROM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MBPFF: $3.05 vs. NROM: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: MBPFF and NROM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBPFF: 6% vs. NROM: 2%
Market capitalization -- MBPFF: $1.79B vs. NROM: $8.25M
MBPFF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.79B. NROM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $8.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBPFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNROM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBPFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NROM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NROM is a better buy in the long-term than MBPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBPFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NROM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBPFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NROM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBPFF and NROM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBPFF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NROM (@Restaurants) price change was +9.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

NROM is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-4.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBPFF($1.76B) has a higher market cap than NROM($8.25M). NROM has higher P/E ratio than MBPFF: NROM (32.00) vs MBPFF (9.68). NROM YTD gains are higher at: 13.405 vs. MBPFF (12.546). MBPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 304M vs. NROM (2.25M). MBPFF has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. NROM (551K). NROM has less debt than MBPFF: NROM (11.9M) vs MBPFF (1.71B). MBPFF has higher revenues than NROM: MBPFF (2.62B) vs NROM (14.8M).
MBPFFNROMMBPFF / NROM
Capitalization1.76B8.25M21,379%
EBITDA304M2.25M13,505%
Gain YTD12.54613.40594%
P/E Ratio9.6832.0030%
Revenue2.62B14.8M17,682%
Total Cash194M551K35,209%
Total Debt1.71B11.9M14,361%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBPFF vs NROM: Fundamental Ratings
MBPFF
NROM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2936
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9469
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBPFF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NROM (73). This means that MBPFF’s stock grew similarly to NROM’s over the last 12 months.

MBPFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NROM (100). This means that MBPFF’s stock grew similarly to NROM’s over the last 12 months.

NROM's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MBPFF (94). This means that NROM’s stock grew similarly to MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

NROM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MBPFF (64). This means that NROM’s stock grew similarly to MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

NROM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBPFF (98). This means that NROM’s stock grew significantly faster than MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBPFFNROM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MBPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NROM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NABAX11.99N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Abs Ret Multi-Mgr A
RSLDX71.21-0.59
-0.82%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
HFDRX19.29-0.20
-1.03%
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R3
HSLSX44.85-0.52
-1.15%
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
NDVCX17.08-0.23
-1.33%
MFS New Discovery Value C

MBPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBPFF and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBPFF and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBPFF
1D Price
Change %
MBPFF100%
N/A
RTBRF - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NROM - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - MBPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - MBPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NROM and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NROM and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NROM
1D Price
Change %
NROM100%
N/A
RTBRF - NROM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - NROM
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MHGU - NROM
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
MTYFF - NROM
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
MBPFF - NROM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More