MBPFF
Price
$3.45
Change
-$0.25 (-6.76%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.33B
NROM
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBPFF vs NROM

Header iconMBPFF vs NROM Comparison
Open Charts MBPFF vs NROMBanner chart's image
Mitchells & Butlers
Price$3.45
Change-$0.25 (-6.76%)
Volume$110
Capitalization2.33B
Noble Roman's
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization4.07M
MBPFF vs NROM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NROM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBPFF vs. NROM commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBPFF is a Hold and NROM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MBPFF: $3.45 vs. NROM: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: MBPFF and NROM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBPFF: 20% vs. NROM: 15%
Market capitalization -- MBPFF: $2.33B vs. NROM: $4.07M
MBPFF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.33B. NROM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBPFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNROM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBPFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NROM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBPFF is a better buy in the long-term than NROM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBPFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NROM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBPFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NROM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBPFF is a better buy in the short-term than NROM.

Price Growth

MBPFF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NROM (@Restaurants) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

NROM is expected to report earnings on Jun 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.12% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBPFF($2.33B) has a higher market cap than NROM($4.07M). NROM has higher P/E ratio than MBPFF: NROM (18.60) vs MBPFF (9.07). MBPFF YTD gains are higher at: 13.115 vs. NROM (-47.313). MBPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 461M vs. NROM (2.25M). MBPFF has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. NROM (551K). NROM has less debt than MBPFF: NROM (11.9M) vs MBPFF (1.57B). MBPFF has higher revenues than NROM: MBPFF (2.67B) vs NROM (14.8M).
MBPFFNROMMBPFF / NROM
Capitalization2.33B4.07M57,108%
EBITDA461M2.25M20,480%
Gain YTD13.115-47.313-28%
P/E Ratio9.0718.6049%
Revenue2.67B14.8M18,027%
Total Cash253M551K45,917%
Total Debt1.57B11.9M13,193%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBPFF vs NROM: Fundamental Ratings
MBPFF
NROM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9811
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
9369
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5791
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9970
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBPFF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NROM (64). This means that MBPFF’s stock grew similarly to NROM’s over the last 12 months.

MBPFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as NROM (100). This means that MBPFF’s stock grew similarly to NROM’s over the last 12 months.

NROM's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MBPFF (93). This means that NROM’s stock grew similarly to MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

MBPFF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NROM (91). This means that MBPFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NROM’s over the last 12 months.

NROM's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MBPFF (99). This means that NROM’s stock grew similarly to MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBPFFNROM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NROM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGDAX31.60N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth A
MADVX20.74N/A
N/A
BlackRock Equity Dividend Instl
GSQRX32.47N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
TQVIX18.42N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Integrated US LCV Eq I
MVGIX18.27-0.03
-0.16%
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity I

MBPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBPFF and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBPFF and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBPFF
1D Price
Change %
MBPFF100%
N/A
RTBRF - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NROM - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - MBPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - MBPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NROM and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NROM and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NROM
1D Price
Change %
NROM100%
N/A
RTBRF - NROM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - NROM
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MHGU - NROM
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTYFF - NROM
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
MBPFF - NROM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More