MBPFF
Price
$3.45
Change
-$0.25 (-6.76%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.03B
RSTRF
Price
$65.58
Change
-$5.49 (-7.72%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
21.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBPFF vs RSTRF

Header iconMBPFF vs RSTRF Comparison
Open Charts MBPFF vs RSTRFBanner chart's image
Mitchells & Butlers
Price$3.45
Change-$0.25 (-6.76%)
Volume$110
Capitalization2.03B
Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership
Price$65.58
Change-$5.49 (-7.72%)
Volume$152
Capitalization21.1B
MBPFF vs RSTRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBPFF vs. RSTRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBPFF is a Hold and RSTRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MBPFF: $3.45 vs. RSTRF: $65.58)
Brand notoriety: MBPFF and RSTRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBPFF: 59% vs. RSTRF: 28%
Market capitalization -- MBPFF: $2.03B vs. RSTRF: $21.1B
MBPFF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.03B. RSTRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $21.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBPFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSTRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBPFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSTRF is a better buy in the long-term than MBPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBPFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSTRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBPFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RSTRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBPFF and RSTRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBPFF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSTRF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSTRF($21.1B) has a higher market cap than MBPFF($2.03B). RSTRF has higher P/E ratio than MBPFF: RSTRF (24.56) vs MBPFF (9.17). MBPFF YTD gains are higher at: 13.115 vs. RSTRF (-5.122). RSTRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.44B vs. MBPFF (461M). RSTRF has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. MBPFF (253M). MBPFF has less debt than RSTRF: MBPFF (1.57B) vs RSTRF (16B). RSTRF has higher revenues than MBPFF: RSTRF (9.11B) vs MBPFF (2.67B).
MBPFFRSTRFMBPFF / RSTRF
Capitalization2.03B21.1B10%
EBITDA461M2.44B19%
Gain YTD13.115-5.122-256%
P/E Ratio9.1724.5637%
Revenue2.67B9.11B29%
Total Cash253M1.03B25%
Total Debt1.57B16B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBPFF vs RSTRF: Fundamental Ratings
MBPFF
RSTRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3998
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8248
SMR RATING
1..100
9339
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBPFF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSTRF (98). This means that MBPFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBPFF (82). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBPFF (93). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

MBPFF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as RSTRF (62). This means that MBPFF’s stock grew similarly to RSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBPFF (99). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew significantly faster than MBPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBPFFRSTRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETX18.920.38
+2.05%
EATON VANCE Municipal Income 2028 TERM TRUST
GARP62.750.08
+0.13%
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
PHK4.99N/A
+0.10%
PIMCO High Income Fund
VONG115.61-0.14
-0.12%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
FTWO37.32-0.18
-0.47%
Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF

MBPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBPFF and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBPFF and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBPFF
1D Price
Change %
MBPFF100%
N/A
RTBRF - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NROM - MBPFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - MBPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - MBPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSTRF and SGLOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSTRF and SGLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSTRF
1D Price
Change %
RSTRF100%
N/A
SGLOF - RSTRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEN - RSTRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
MTYFF - RSTRF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
PZRIF - RSTRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTBRF - RSTRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More