Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBSCX vs MDXBX
MBSCX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts MBSCX vs MDXBX
MFS SC Municipal Bond B
Price$10.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.64M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
MBSCX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBSCX vs. MDXBX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBSCX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. MBSCX (215M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than MBSCX: MDXBX (3.51) vs MBSCX (2.60). MBSCX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: MBSCX (32 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). MBSCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MBSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). MBSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MBSCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. MBSCX (-3.53). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 1.05 vs. MBSCX (-5.73).
| MBSCX | MDXBX | MBSCX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.49 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.53 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.509 | -1.398 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 215M | 2.28B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 3.51 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | -1.78 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.12 | 4.92 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.73 | 1.05 | -546% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.61 | 12.81 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers