Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBSCX vs MDXBX
MBSCX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts MBSCX vs MDXBX
MFS SC Municipal Bond B
Price$11.00
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.09M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
MBSCX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBSCX vs. MDXBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBSCX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. MBSCX (218M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than MBSCX: MDXBX (3.50) vs MBSCX (2.61). MBSCX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: MBSCX (32 years) vs MDXBX (39 years). MBSCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MBSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). MBSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MBSCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. MBSCX (-0.05). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. MBSCX (-1.64).
| MBSCX | MDXBX | MBSCX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.49 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.53 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.115 | 2.061 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 2.34B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 3.50 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.05 | 1.47 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.09 | 12.98 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.64 | 5.55 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.55 | 16.99 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers