MBUMY
Price
$7.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
MRETF
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

MBUMY vs MRETF

Header iconMBUMY vs MRETF Comparison
Open Charts MBUMY vs MRETFBanner chart's image
Mabuchi Motor
Price$7.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$290
CapitalizationN/A
Martinrea International
Price$7.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$49.93K
CapitalizationN/A
MBUMY vs MRETF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBUMY vs. MRETF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBUMY is a Hold and MRETF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (MBUMY: $7.63 vs. MRETF: $7.02)
Brand notoriety: MBUMY and MRETF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBUMY: 43% vs. MRETF: 1202%
Market capitalization -- MBUMY: $1.87B vs. MRETF: $895.71M
MBUMY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $1.87B. MRETF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $895.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBUMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRETF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBUMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBUMY is a better buy in the long-term than MRETF.

Price Growth

MBUMY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRETF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -8.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.98% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBUMY($1.87B) has a higher market cap than MRETF($896M). MBUMY has higher P/E ratio than MRETF: MBUMY (17.89) vs MRETF (7.58). MBUMY YTD gains are higher at: -11.516 vs. MRETF (-35.740). MBUMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.94B vs. MRETF (557M). MBUMY has more cash in the bank: 99.3B vs. MRETF (157M). MBUMY has less debt than MRETF: MBUMY (1.14B) vs MRETF (1.38B). MBUMY has higher revenues than MRETF: MBUMY (160B) vs MRETF (4.91B).
MBUMYMRETFMBUMY / MRETF
Capitalization1.87B896M209%
EBITDA9.94B557M1,784%
Gain YTD-11.516-35.74032%
P/E Ratio17.897.58236%
Revenue160B4.91B3,261%
Total Cash99.3B157M63,248%
Total Debt1.14B1.38B82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBUMY vs MRETF: Fundamental Ratings
MBUMY
MRETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4685
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
7771
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5662
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBUMY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MRETF (20). This means that MBUMY’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

MBUMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as MRETF (100). This means that MBUMY’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

MRETF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as MBUMY (77). This means that MRETF’s stock grew similarly to MBUMY’s over the last 12 months.

MBUMY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MRETF (62). This means that MBUMY’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

MBUMY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MRETF (78). This means that MBUMY’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGDVX17.090.02
+0.12%
TCW Relative Value Large Cap N
GCHDX13.77-0.01
-0.07%
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
BMCKX28.45-0.04
-0.14%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr K
RTITX10.57-0.08
-0.75%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq M
DIGGX111.03-1.24
-1.10%
Invesco Discovery R5

MBUMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBUMY and KOTMF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBUMY and KOTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBUMY
1D Price
Change %
MBUMY100%
N/A
KOTMF - MBUMY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRETF - MBUMY
8%
Poorly correlated
-8.87%
KOTMY - MBUMY
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.90%
LIMAF - MBUMY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
KNBHF - MBUMY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRETF and MGA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRETF and MGA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRETF
1D Price
Change %
MRETF100%
-8.87%
MGA - MRETF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
AXL - MRETF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
VLEEY - MRETF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
LIMAF - MRETF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
ADNT - MRETF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
More