MBWM
Price
$46.21
Change
-$0.38 (-0.82%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
751.82M
27 days until earnings call
NBHC
Price
$39.06
Change
-$0.44 (-1.11%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.48B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs NBHC

Header iconMBWM vs NBHC Comparison
Open Charts MBWM vs NBHCBanner chart's image
Mercantile Bank
Price$46.21
Change-$0.38 (-0.82%)
Volume$526
Capitalization751.82M
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS
Price$39.06
Change-$0.44 (-1.11%)
Volume$4.64K
Capitalization1.48B
MBWM vs NBHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBWM vs. NBHC commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a StrongBuy and NBHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (MBWM: $46.27 vs. NBHC: $39.08)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and NBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 74% vs. NBHC: 96%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $751.82M vs. NBHC: $1.48B
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $751.82M. NBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNBHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than NBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NBHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBHC is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while NBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBHC($1.48B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($752M). NBHC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: NBHC (12.65) vs MBWM (9.20). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 6.574 vs. NBHC (-7.149). NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. MBWM (98.9M). NBHC has less debt than MBWM: NBHC (239M) vs MBWM (496M). NBHC has higher revenues than MBWM: NBHC (409M) vs MBWM (235M).
MBWMNBHCMBWM / NBHC
Capitalization752M1.48B51%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.574-7.149-92%
P/E Ratio9.2012.6573%
Revenue235M409M57%
Total Cash98.9M369M27%
Total Debt496M239M208%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs NBHC: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
NBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1856
SMR RATING
1..100
2620
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4047
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (46). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBHC (56). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (26). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (57). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (47). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMNBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCIEX20.30N/A
N/A
PACE International Equity P
VSCRX56.91N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core R6
PIODX46.98N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer A
EMECX13.25N/A
N/A
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C
MRAEX13.47N/A
N/A
Meridian Hedged Equity A

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-0.69%
PEBO - MBWM
91%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
STBA - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
SBSI - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
TCBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
MCBS - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
More

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
-1.06%
STBA - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
BBT - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
FNB - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
HOPE - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
EFSC - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More