MBWM
Price
$45.37
Change
+$0.35 (+0.78%)
Updated
Oct 10, 10:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
733.46M
11 days until earnings call
PDLB
Price
$14.52
Change
-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
330.56M
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs PDLB

Header iconMBWM vs PDLB Comparison
Open Charts MBWM vs PDLBBanner chart's image
Mercantile Bank
Price$45.37
Change+$0.35 (+0.78%)
Volume$300
Capitalization733.46M
Ponce Financial Group
Price$14.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Volume$44.03K
Capitalization330.56M
MBWM vs PDLB Comparison Chart in %
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBWM vs. PDLB commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a StrongBuy and PDLB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (MBWM: $45.02 vs. PDLB: $14.52)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and PDLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 104% vs. PDLB: 124%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $733.46M vs. PDLB: $330.56M
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $733.46M. PDLB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $330.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePDLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PDLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than PDLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDLB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PDLB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PDLB is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while PDLB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

PDLB is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($733M) has a higher market cap than PDLB($331M). PDLB has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: PDLB (20.45) vs MBWM (8.95). PDLB YTD gains are higher at: 11.692 vs. MBWM (3.695). MBWM has less debt than PDLB: MBWM (496M) vs PDLB (567M). MBWM has higher revenues than PDLB: MBWM (235M) vs PDLB (92.3M).
MBWMPDLBMBWM / PDLB
Capitalization733M331M221%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.69511.69232%
P/E Ratio8.9520.4544%
Revenue235M92.3M255%
Total Cash98.9MN/A-
Total Debt496M567M87%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs PDLB: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
PDLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5752
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1858
SMR RATING
1..100
2654
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4687
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (78). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (58). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PDLB (54). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

PDLB's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (59). This means that PDLB’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (87). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMPDLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCUCF96.72N/A
N/A
Brunello Cucinelli S P A
BMNM1.25N/A
N/A
Bimini Capital Management, Inc.
ELUXY11.06N/A
N/A
AB Electrolux
SHGXY0.56N/A
N/A
Shenguan Holdings Group Ltd
CAIXY3.42-0.04
-1.16%
Caixabank SA