Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXAX vs RHSCX
MBXAX vs RHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBXAX vs. RHSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBXAX is a Hold and RHSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXAX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. RHSCX (9.53M). RHSCX pays higher dividends than MBXAX: RHSCX (5.90) vs MBXAX (1.61). MBXAX was incepted earlier than RHSCX: MBXAX (10 years) vs RHSCX (9 years). RHSCX (3.98) is less costly to investors than MBXAX (2.28). RHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXAX (19.00). RHSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXAX: RHSCX (1000) vs MBXAX (2500). MBXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. RHSCX (-0.55). MBXAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.84 vs. RHSCX (20.96).
| MBXAX | RHSCX | MBXAX / RHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 3.98 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.220 | 2.036 | 60% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 9.53M | 85,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 5.90 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -0.55 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.68 | 30.40 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.84 | 20.96 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement