Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXIX vs RHSCX
MBXIX vs RHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBXIX vs. RHSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBXIX is a Hold and RHSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. RHSCX (9.53M). RHSCX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: RHSCX (5.90) vs MBXIX (1.80). MBXIX was incepted earlier than RHSCX: MBXIX (10 years) vs RHSCX (9 years). RHSCX (3.98) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). RHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). RHSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXIX: RHSCX (1000) vs MBXIX (2500). MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.37 vs. RHSCX (-0.55). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. RHSCX (20.96).
| MBXIX | RHSCX | MBXIX / RHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 2.91 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 3.98 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.417 | 2.036 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 9.53M | 85,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 5.90 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | -0.55 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.52 | 30.40 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.69 | 20.96 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement