MC
Price
$71.28
Change
-$3.12 (-4.19%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:49 PM (EDT)
49 days until earnings call
PIPR
Price
$299.74
Change
-$12.45 (-3.99%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:27 PM (EDT)
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MC vs PIPR

Header iconMC vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts MC vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$71.28
Change-$3.12 (-4.19%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$299.74
Change-$12.45 (-3.99%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
MC vs PIPR Comparison Chart
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. PIPR commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Buy and PIPR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MC: $74.40 vs. PIPR: $312.19)
Brand notoriety: MC and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 107% vs. PIPR: 91%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. PIPR: $2.98B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than MC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.27% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($2.98B). MC has higher P/E ratio than PIPR: MC (82.58) vs PIPR (39.76). PIPR YTD gains are higher at: 81.352 vs. MC (38.102). PIPR has less debt than MC: PIPR (164M) vs MC (216M). PIPR has higher revenues than MC: PIPR (1.3B) vs MC (855M).
MCPIPRMC / PIPR
Capitalization3.79B2.98B127%
EBITDA-32.04MN/A-
Gain YTD38.10281.35247%
P/E Ratio82.5839.76208%
Revenue855M1.3B66%
Total Cash186MN/A-
Total Debt216M164M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
MC
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
666
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
205
SMR RATING
1..100
6447
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (32) in the null industry. This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as MC (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MC (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MC (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as MC (98) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSGSX47.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Svc
MADCX24.29-0.03
-0.12%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Instl
IYEFX8.92-0.04
-0.45%
Delaware Climate Solutions R
FFAFX84.52-0.42
-0.49%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
SMXAX20.66-0.24
-1.15%
SEI Extended Market Index A (SIIT)

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
-2.85%
EVR - PIPR
83%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
MC - PIPR
80%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
HLI - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
SF - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
PJT - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
More