MC
Price
$67.70
Change
+$0.59 (+0.88%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.02B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
QLVD
Price
$31.24
Change
+$0.27 (+0.87%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Net Assets
60.78M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs QLVD

Header iconMC vs QLVD Comparison
Open Charts MC vs QLVDBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$67.70
Change+$0.59 (+0.88%)
Volume$584.16K
Capitalization5.02B
FlexShares Dev Mks ex-US Qual Lw Vol ETF
Price$31.24
Change+$0.27 (+0.87%)
Volume$4.12K
Net Assets60.78M
MC vs QLVD Comparison Chart in %
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLVD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. QLVD commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and QLVD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MC: $67.70)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +7.31% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.26% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCQLVD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLVD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WPOPX13.53N/A
N/A
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
FSTUX28.46N/A
N/A
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
NIQCX14.76N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
VFWAX44.83N/A
N/A
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Admiral
BTEEX15.66-0.04
-0.28%
Baron Technology Retail

QLVD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QLVD and TLS have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLVD and TLS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLVD
1D Price
Change %
QLVD100%
+0.88%
TLS - QLVD
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
ESLT - QLVD
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
MC - QLVD
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
BHP - QLVD
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
TRN - QLVD
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More