Ad is loading...
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$20.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MCCPX (1.6B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (3.97) vs RLBFX (2.26). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. MCCPX (2.94). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.47 vs. MCCPX (16.80).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.967 | 0.528 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 234B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 2.26 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 5.06 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.36 | 22.75 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.80 | 38.47 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.93 | 53.33 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...