Ad is loading...
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Inv C
Price$21.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.46
Change+$0.24 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.03B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. MCCPX (1.64B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MCCPX: RLBFX (2.50) vs MCCPX (1.99). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (30 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MCCPX (152.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. MCCPX (9.35). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.52 vs. MCCPX (12.10).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.272 | 3.111 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 241B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.50 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 12.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.47 | 15.45 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.10 | 35.52 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.58 | 60.27 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...