Ad is loading...
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$20.62
Change-$0.10 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.04
Change-$0.10 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.94B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 233B vs. MCCPX (1.59B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (3.88) vs RLBFX (2.19). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (30 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MCCPX (127.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.40 vs. MCCPX (3.28). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.82 vs. MCCPX (29.61).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.30 | 523% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.30 | 527% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.145 | -0.639 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 233B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 2.19 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | 4.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.68 | 15.75 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.61 | 50.82 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.09 | 54.19 | 11% |