Ad is loading...
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$20.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.9B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. MCCPX (1.54B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (3.98) vs RLBFX (2.26). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MCCPX (127.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. MCCPX (1.85). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. MCCPX (13.95).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.30 | 523% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.30 | 527% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.997 | -3.617 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 2.26 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.85 | 2.88 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.94 | 10.75 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.95 | 33.40 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.09 | 47.01 | 2% |