Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$21.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.61
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.44B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. MCCPX (1.7B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (2.47) vs RLBFX (2.08). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. MCCPX (3.96). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.10 vs. MCCPX (10.17).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.350 | 10.185 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 2.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 9.54 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.17 | 30.96 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 40.10 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.01 | 69.34 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement