MCCRF
Price
$2.63
Change
-$0.05 (-1.87%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
31.4M
PLSDF
Price
$2.99
Change
+$0.04 (+1.36%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
82.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCCRF vs PLSDF

Header iconMCCRF vs PLSDF Comparison
Open Charts MCCRF vs PLSDFBanner chart's image
McCoy Global
Price$2.63
Change-$0.05 (-1.87%)
Volume$12.85K
Capitalization31.4M
Pulse Seismic
Price$2.99
Change+$0.04 (+1.36%)
Volume$30.52K
Capitalization82.4M
MCCRF vs PLSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCCRF vs. PLSDF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCRF is a StrongBuy and PLSDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MCCRF: $2.63 vs. PLSDF: $2.99)
Brand notoriety: MCCRF and PLSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCCRF: 151% vs. PLSDF: 154%
Market capitalization -- MCCRF: $31.4M vs. PLSDF: $82.4M
MCCRF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $31.4M. PLSDF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $82.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCCRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCCRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PLSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCCRF is a better buy in the long-term than PLSDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCCRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLSDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCCRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PLSDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the short-term than MCCRF.

Price Growth

MCCRF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while PLSDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLSDF($82.4M) has a higher market cap than MCCRF($31.4M). PLSDF has higher P/E ratio than MCCRF: PLSDF (39.84) vs MCCRF (4.72). PLSDF YTD gains are higher at: 80.416 vs. MCCRF (32.828). PLSDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.9M vs. MCCRF (11.5M). MCCRF has more cash in the bank: 21.5M vs. PLSDF (9.69M). PLSDF has less debt than MCCRF: PLSDF (327K) vs MCCRF (10.1M). MCCRF has higher revenues than PLSDF: MCCRF (52.4M) vs PLSDF (21.8M).
MCCRFPLSDFMCCRF / PLSDF
Capitalization31.4M82.4M38%
EBITDA11.5M14.9M77%
Gain YTD32.82880.41641%
P/E Ratio4.7239.8412%
Revenue52.4M21.8M240%
Total Cash21.5M9.69M222%
Total Debt10.1M327K3,089%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCCRF vs PLSDF: Fundamental Ratings
MCCRF
PLSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7490
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1721
SMR RATING
1..100
5514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1668
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCCRF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (43). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (21). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCCRF (55). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCCRF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MCCRF (44). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to MCCRF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCRF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLSDF (68). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCCRFPLSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIAC0.060.01
+11.93%
Princeton Capital Corporation
HBGRY1.170.02
+1.76%
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
OLGPF0.79N/A
N/A
Olam Group Ltd.
ACGX0.08N/A
N/A
Alliance Creative Group, Inc.
STOSF5.01N/A
N/A
Santos Ltd.

MCCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCCRF and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCCRF and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCCRF
1D Price
Change %
MCCRF100%
-1.94%
PLSDF - MCCRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
NSFDF - MCCRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
KEGX - MCCRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - MCCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - MCCRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
More

PLSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSDF and QSEP have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSDF and QSEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSDF
1D Price
Change %
PLSDF100%
+1.42%
QSEP - PLSDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
MCCRF - PLSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
PDER - PLSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
PSYTF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More