MCCRF
Price
$2.63
Change
-$0.05 (-1.87%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
31.4M
QSEP
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
23.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCCRF vs QSEP

Header iconMCCRF vs QSEP Comparison
Open Charts MCCRF vs QSEPBanner chart's image
McCoy Global
Price$2.63
Change-$0.05 (-1.87%)
Volume$12.85K
Capitalization31.4M
QS Energy
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$96.56K
Capitalization23.82M
MCCRF vs QSEP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCCRF vs. QSEP commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCRF is a StrongBuy and QSEP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MCCRF: $2.63 vs. QSEP: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: MCCRF and QSEP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCCRF: 151% vs. QSEP: 32%
Market capitalization -- MCCRF: $31.4M vs. QSEP: $23.82M
MCCRF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $31.4M. QSEP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $23.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCCRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQSEP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCCRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QSEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCCRF is a better buy in the long-term than QSEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCCRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSEP’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCCRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QSEP’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCCRF is a better buy in the short-term than QSEP.

Price Growth

MCCRF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while QSEP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -12.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCCRF($31.4M) has a higher market cap than QSEP($23.8M). QSEP YTD gains are higher at: 59.933 vs. MCCRF (32.828). MCCRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.5M vs. QSEP (-1.2M). MCCRF has more cash in the bank: 21.5M vs. QSEP (107K). QSEP has less debt than MCCRF: QSEP (1.91M) vs MCCRF (10.1M). MCCRF has higher revenues than QSEP: MCCRF (52.4M) vs QSEP (0).
MCCRFQSEPMCCRF / QSEP
Capitalization31.4M23.8M132%
EBITDA11.5M-1.2M-958%
Gain YTD32.82859.93355%
P/E Ratio4.72N/A-
Revenue52.4M0-
Total Cash21.5M107K20,093%
Total Debt10.1M1.91M528%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCCRF vs QSEP: Fundamental Ratings
MCCRF
QSEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
743
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1747
SMR RATING
1..100
55100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCCRF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (98). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

MCCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (47). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

MCCRF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MCCRF (44). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to MCCRF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCRF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCCRFQSEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGNOF0.210.02
+10.53%
Diagnos Inc.
WIZEY14.460.37
+2.60%
WISE PLC
VTDRF12.00N/A
N/A
Vantage Drilling International Ltd
DWVYF22.90N/A
N/A
Derwent Valley Holdings Plc
MHGUP20.30N/A
N/A
Meritage Hospitality Group, Inc.

MCCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCCRF and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCCRF and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCCRF
1D Price
Change %
MCCRF100%
-1.94%
PLSDF - MCCRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
NSFDF - MCCRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
KEGX - MCCRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - MCCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - MCCRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
More

QSEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QSEP and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSEP and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSEP
1D Price
Change %
QSEP100%
-1.44%
PLSDF - QSEP
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
TAGP - QSEP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEGX - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
NSFDF - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More