Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWBX
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$22.77
Change+$0.12 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.18
Change+$0.57 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. MCDCX (2.16B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCDCX (1.06) vs RNWBX (0.13). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). MCDCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). MCDCX (16.72) and RNWBX (16.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. MCDCX (8.83).
| MCDCX | RNWBX | MCDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.67 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.328 | 22.610 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.16B | 74.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.13 | 846% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.72 | 16.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.35 | 46.85 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.83 | 25.99 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.73 | 89.59 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement