Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWBX
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$23.05
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. MCDCX (1.97B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCDCX (0.96) vs RNWBX (0.12). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). MCDCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). MCDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.13 vs. RNWBX (17.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.89 vs. MCDCX (0.69).
| MCDCX | RNWBX | MCDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.67 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.67 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.470 | 22.896 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 74.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.12 | 822% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.13 | 17.87 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 43.03 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | 15.89 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.03 | 82.21 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement