Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWBX
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$23.21
Change-$0.22 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. MCDCX (2.18B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCDCX (0.99) vs RNWBX (0.12). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). MCDCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). MCDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.38 vs. RNWBX (11.48). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.41 vs. MCDCX (11.86).
| MCDCX | RNWBX | MCDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.67 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.506 | 23.671 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 75.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.12 | 825% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.38 | 11.48 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.65 | 54.43 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.86 | 25.41 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.00 | 86.19 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers