Ad is loading...
MCDCX vs RNWFX
MCDCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWFX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$18.78
Change+$0.08 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.8B
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.18
Change+$0.21 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.88B
MCDCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 61.9B vs. MCDCX (3.8B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: MCDCX (1.29) vs RNWFX (1.17). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: MCDCX (30 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). MCDCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWFX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.13 vs. MCDCX (-3.21). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.43 vs. MCDCX (21.69).
| MCDCX | RNWFX | MCDCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.62 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.62 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.482 | 2.485 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.8B | 61.9B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.17 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.21 | 1.13 | -283% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.47 | 4.15 | -180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.69 | 54.43 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.72 | 46.94 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...