Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWFX
MCDCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWFX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$23.21
Change-$0.22 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
MCDCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. MCDCX (2.18B). MCDCX (0.99) and RNWFX (0.97) have matching dividends . MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). MCDCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWFX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). RNWFX (12.79) and MCDCX (12.38) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.85 vs. MCDCX (11.86).
| MCDCX | RNWFX | MCDCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.62 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.62 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.506 | 24.657 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 75.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.97 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.38 | 12.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.65 | 57.93 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.86 | 30.85 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.00 | 95.27 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers