Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCHFX
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCHFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
Matthews China Investor
Price$16.91
Change+$0.22 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.14M
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCHFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MCHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 400M vs. MCDFX (95.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCHFX: MCDFX (3.08) vs MCHFX (1.62). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCDFX (2500) and MCHFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.61 vs. MCDFX (42.70). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.31 vs. MCHFX (-31.68).
| MCDFX | MCHFX | MCDFX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.648 | 24.182 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.7M | 400M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.62 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.70 | 53.61 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 10.45 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.31 | -31.68 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.87 | -7.91 | -567% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement