Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCHFX
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCHFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
Matthews China Investor
Price$18.68
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCHFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MCHFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 475M vs. MCDFX (104M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCHFX: MCDFX (2.78) vs MCHFX (1.39). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCDFX (2500) and MCHFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. MCHFX (13.32). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.19 vs. MCHFX (-22.70).
| MCDFX | MCHFX | MCDFX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.935 | 38.616 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 475M | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.39 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | 13.32 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.93 | 43.33 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.19 | -22.70 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.17 | -4.11 | -1,173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers