Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.60
Change+$0.19 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.61
Change+$0.13 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.28M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. MCSMX (62.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (3.26) vs MCSMX (1.22). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.11 vs. MCSMX (24.95). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.72 vs. MCSMX (-43.43).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.918 | 15.418 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 62.3M | 145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.22 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.11 | 24.95 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.94 | -10.91 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.72 | -43.43 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.87 | 10.62 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement