Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$11.51
Change+$0.11 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.37M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.05
Change+$0.13 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.39M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.4M vs. MCSMX (64.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (4.23) vs MCSMX (2.41). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (15 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.05 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.67 vs. MCSMX (10.64). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -20.38 vs. MCSMX (-31.89).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.540 | -0.330 | 769% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.4M | 64.4M | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.23 | 2.41 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.67 | 10.64 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.51 | -38.63 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.38 | -31.89 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.50 | 12.72 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...