Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.26M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. MCSMX (66.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (3.08) vs MCSMX (1.14). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.73 vs. MCSMX (35.34). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.64 vs. MCSMX (-45.89).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.882 | 19.714 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.7M | 66.3M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.14 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.73 | 35.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.41 | -7.89 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.64 | -45.89 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.36 | 25.11 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement