Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$11.95
Change+$0.43 (+3.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$8.72
Change+$0.39 (+4.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. MCSMX (65.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (3.57) vs MCSMX (1.25). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (15 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.40) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.05 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. MCSMX (-6.20). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.82 vs. MCSMX (-40.69).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.456 | -8.260 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 65.7M | 143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.25 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.90 | -6.20 | -240% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.79 | -32.03 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.82 | -40.69 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.01 | -12.49 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers