Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.87
Change+$0.08 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MCSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. MCSMX (65.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (3.72) vs MCSMX (1.31). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (15 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.40) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.39 vs. MCSMX (3.43). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.51 vs. MCSMX (-38.87).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.298 | 3.744 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 65.7M | 143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.72 | 1.31 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.39 | 3.43 | 536% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.46 | -9.75 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.51 | -38.87 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.62 | -7.12 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...