Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$12.19
Change-$0.07 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.74M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. MCSMX (72.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (2.78) vs MCSMX (1.01). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.00 vs. MCDFX (14.24). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.35 vs. MCSMX (-38.63).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.021 | 35.022 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 72.7M | 143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.01 | 277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 17.00 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.02 | 27.41 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.35 | -38.63 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.27 | 51.34 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement