Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.34
Change-$0.18 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.23M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. MCSMX (68.2M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (2.84) vs MCSMX (1.04). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.76 vs. MCSMX (29.72). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.34 vs. MCSMX (-42.55).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.823 | 26.872 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 68.2M | 146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.04 | 273% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.76 | 29.72 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.10 | 12.21 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.34 | -42.55 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.66 | 33.15 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement