Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs MICDX
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICDX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$12.22
Change+$0.09 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICDX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX (93.9M) and MICDX (93.9M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MCDFX (3.57) and MICDX (3.44) have matching dividends . MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: MCDFX (15 years) vs MICDX (14 years). MCDFX (1.17) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.04). MCDFX (27.30) and MICDX (27.30) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX (26.88) and MCDFX (26.75) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -2.17 vs. MCDFX (-2.73).
| MCDFX | MICDX | MCDFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.04 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.04 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.826 | 4.818 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 93.9M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 3.44 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.75 | 26.88 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.04 | -6.71 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.73 | -2.17 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.51 | 0.85 | -59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers