Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICFX
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.13
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.97
Change-$0.07 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.75M
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MICFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 441M vs. MCDFX (99.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MICFX: MCDFX (2.90) vs MICFX (1.53). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MICFX (49.99). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.62 vs. MCDFX (52.20). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.31 vs. MICFX (-21.91).
| MCDFX | MICFX | MCDFX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.786 | 33.905 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.4M | 441M | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 1.53 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.20 | 65.62 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.55 | 25.15 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.31 | -21.91 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.27 | 0.80 | 6,295% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement