Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs MICFX
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Matthews China Instl
Price$13.36
Change+$0.09 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.43M
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MICFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. MCDFX (93.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MICFX: MCDFX (3.57) vs MICFX (1.78). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICFX: MCDFX (15 years) vs MICFX (14 years). MCDFX (1.17) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.01). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.60 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICFX (100000). MCDFX (26.75) and MICFX (25.88) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.73 vs. MICFX (-24.62).
| MCDFX | MICFX | MCDFX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.01 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.01 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.826 | 1.043 | 463% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 392M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.78 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.75 | 25.88 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.04 | -11.83 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.73 | -24.62 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.51 | -41.43 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...