Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICFX
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.51
Change-$0.12 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 456M vs. MCDFX (99.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MICFX: MCDFX (2.84) vs MICFX (1.46). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MICFX (49.99). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICFX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.76 vs. MICFX (27.63). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.34 vs. MICFX (-30.41).
| MCDFX | MICFX | MCDFX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.823 | 31.371 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 456M | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.46 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.76 | 27.63 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.10 | 25.33 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.34 | -30.41 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.66 | -13.09 | -288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement