Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICFX
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.23
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Matthews China Instl
Price$14.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.43M
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. MCDFX (93.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MICFX: MCDFX (3.62) vs MICFX (1.87). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MICFX (49.99). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.18 vs. MCDFX (18.79). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.16 vs. MICFX (-26.59).
| MCDFX | MICFX | MCDFX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.854 | 8.942 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 392M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.87 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.79 | 20.18 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | -9.40 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.16 | -26.59 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.81 | -37.34 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement