Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MMCFX
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MMCFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
AMG Veritas China N
Price$15.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.65M
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MMCFX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. MMCFX (41.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs MMCFX (1.19). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: MMCFX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.03 vs. MMCFX (14.91). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.44 vs. MMCFX (-55.71).
| MCDFX | MMCFX | MCDFX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.14 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.48 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.670 | 12.657 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.3M | 41.6M | 212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.19 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.03 | 14.91 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.83 | -21.88 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.44 | -55.71 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.66 | -65.91 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement