Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MMCFX
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MMCFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.98
Change-$0.11 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
AMG Veritas China N
Price$15.94
Change-$0.27 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.93M
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MMCFX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. MMCFX (43.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs MMCFX (1.19). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: MMCFX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.78 vs. MMCFX (28.62). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.65 vs. MMCFX (-54.18).
| MCDFX | MMCFX | MCDFX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.14 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.48 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.796 | 19.985 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 43.9M | 206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.19 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.78 | 28.62 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | -14.96 | -78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.65 | -54.18 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.44 | -63.19 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement