Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MMCFX
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MMCFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.83
Change-$0.13 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
AMG Veritas China N
Price$17.97
Change-$0.36 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.82M
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MMCFX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. MMCFX (48.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: MCDFX (2.78) vs MMCFX (0.95). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: MMCFX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (20.86) and MMCFX (20.37) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.88 vs. MMCFX (-53.16).
| MCDFX | MMCFX | MCDFX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.14 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.48 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.316 | 35.677 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 48.8M | 213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 0.95 | 294% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.86 | 20.37 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.45 | 19.16 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.88 | -53.16 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.03 | -54.82 | -68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement