Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MMCFX
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MMCFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.21
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
AMG Veritas China N
Price$15.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.93M
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MMCFX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. MMCFX (41.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: MCDFX (3.62) vs MMCFX (1.23). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: MMCFX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.88 vs. MMCFX (8.39). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.09 vs. MMCFX (-58.30).
| MCDFX | MMCFX | MCDFX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.14 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.48 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.939 | 12.361 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 41.9M | 224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.23 | 293% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.88 | 8.39 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.29 | -17.22 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.09 | -58.30 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.14 | -66.07 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement