Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MMCFX
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MMCFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.13
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
AMG Veritas China N
Price$18.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.93M
MCDFX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MMCFX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. MMCFX (47.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: MCDFX (2.90) vs MMCFX (1.06). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: MMCFX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.20 vs. MMCFX (47.43). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.31 vs. MMCFX (-49.35).
| MCDFX | MMCFX | MCDFX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.14 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.48 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.786 | 34.197 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.4M | 47.9M | 208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 1.06 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.20 | 47.43 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.55 | 4.20 | 632% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.31 | -49.35 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.27 | -56.93 | -88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement