Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.70
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$39.46
Change+$0.18 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.98M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a StrongBuy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. NGCAX (48M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (3.26) vs NGCAX (0.96). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (40.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.05 vs. NGCAX (29.39). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.02 vs. NGCAX (-35.18).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.647 | 18.135 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 48M | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 0.96 | 341% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.05 | 29.39 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.77 | -2.53 | -267% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.02 | -35.18 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.78 | -1.35 | -1,091% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement