Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.15
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$38.50
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.49M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. NGCAX (47.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (3.62) vs NGCAX (1.00). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (40.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (27.03) and NGCAX (26.77) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.18 vs. NGCAX (-30.00).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.362 | 16.271 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.3M | 47.5M | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.00 | 362% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.03 | 26.77 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.10 | -10.07 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.18 | -30.00 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.15 | -5.80 | -123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers