Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$11.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$32.78
Change-$0.29 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.12M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. NGCAX (42.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (3.57) vs NGCAX (0.98). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (15 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. NGCAX (14.14). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.38 vs. NGCAX (-29.09).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.64 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.185 | -0.541 | -219% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 42.1M | 223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 0.98 | 366% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.30 | 14.14 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.49 | -16.93 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.38 | -29.09 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.90 | -24.83 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...