Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.23
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$37.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.32M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. NGCAX (47.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (3.62) vs NGCAX (1.00). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (40.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). NGCAX (18.84) and MCDFX (18.79) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.16 vs. NGCAX (-29.27).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.854 | 14.617 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 47.3M | 199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.00 | 362% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.79 | 18.84 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | -8.02 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.16 | -29.27 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.81 | -9.80 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement