Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$46.52
Change-$0.60 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.79M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. NGCAX (56.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (2.78) vs NGCAX (0.79). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (40.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.27 vs. MCDFX (14.24). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.35 vs. NGCAX (-31.17).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.021 | 41.714 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 56.8M | 183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 0.79 | 351% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 19.27 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.02 | 42.79 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.35 | -31.17 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.27 | 35.05 | 138% |