Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$41.28
Change+$0.23 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. NGCAX (50.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (3.08) vs NGCAX (0.93). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (40.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). NGCAX (42.76) and MCDFX (42.70) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.31 vs. NGCAX (-39.73).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.648 | 23.459 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.7M | 50.8M | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 0.93 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.70 | 42.76 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 6.89 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.31 | -39.73 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.87 | 25.18 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement