Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.23
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$9.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. RBCRX (5.12M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (3.62) vs RBCRX (1.84). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.79 vs. RBCRX (13.87).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.854 | 15.529 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 5.12M | 1,834% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.84 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.79 | 13.87 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | -0.32 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.16 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.81 | 0.49 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement