Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.23
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$9.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. RBCRX (5.21M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (3.62) vs RBCRX (1.84). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.23 vs. RBCRX (19.50).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.103 | 17.529 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.3M | 5.21M | 1,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.84 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.23 | 19.50 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.68 | -0.81 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.40 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.11 | 2.84 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers