Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.03
Change-$0.12 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$9.66
Change-$0.18 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. RBCRX (5.13M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (3.57) vs RBCRX (1.77). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (15 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.78 vs. RBCRX (24.73).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.00 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 6.88 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.346 | 15.765 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 5.13M | 1,830% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.77 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.78 | 24.73 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.90 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.32 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.15 | -0.29 | -5,478% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers