Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$10.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.34M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a StrongBuy and RBCRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. RBCRX (5.35M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (3.26) vs RBCRX (1.76). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.86 vs. RBCRX (24.34).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.560 | 20.706 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 5.35M | 1,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.76 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.86 | 24.34 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.45 | 8.80 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.09 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.47 | 5.84 | 248% |