Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$11.36
Change+$0.09 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and RBCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. RBCRX (5.96M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (3.08) vs RBCRX (1.68). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.38 vs. MCDFX (42.70).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.74 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.648 | 32.588 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.7M | 5.96M | 1,607% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.68 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.70 | 45.38 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 22.24 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.31 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.87 | 16.84 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement