Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.12
Change+$0.22 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.58M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$10.23
Change+$0.15 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.34M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and RBCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 85.6M vs. RBCRX (5.34M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (4.23) vs RBCRX (1.28). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (15 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 130.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX (32.47) and MCDFX (31.23) have marching annual gain over last year.
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.092 | 20.353 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6M | 5.34M | 1,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.23 | 1.28 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.23 | 32.47 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.60 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.11 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.42 | 3.76 | 623% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers