Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs TCELX
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs TCELX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.79
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$12.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.1M
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. TCELX (51.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than TCELX: MCDFX (3.26) vs TCELX (1.29). MCDFX was incepted earlier than TCELX: MCDFX (16 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX (2500) and TCELX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.91 vs. TCELX (21.27). TCELX return over 5 years is better than : -4.90 vs. MCDFX (-7.41).
| MCDFX | TCELX | MCDFX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.67 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.425 | 14.977 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 51.1M | 177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.29 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.91 | 21.27 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.47 | -0.38 | -1,963% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.41 | -4.90 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.54 | N/A | - |