Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs TCELX
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs TCELX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$14.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.41M
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. TCELX (63.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than TCELX: MCDFX (2.90) vs TCELX (1.12). MCDFX was incepted earlier than TCELX: MCDFX (16 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX (2500) and TCELX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.28 vs. TCELX (35.14). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. TCELX (1.97).
| MCDFX | TCELX | MCDFX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.67 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.959 | 29.860 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.4M | 63.4M | 157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 1.12 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.28 | 35.14 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.81 | 28.91 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.50 | 1.97 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement