Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs TCELX
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs TCELX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$13.88
Change-$0.15 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.48M
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. TCELX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. TCELX (62.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than TCELX: MCDFX (2.84) vs TCELX (1.09). MCDFX was incepted earlier than TCELX: MCDFX (16 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX (2500) and TCELX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.76 vs. TCELX (28.96). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.34 vs. TCELX (-10.38).
| MCDFX | TCELX | MCDFX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.67 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.823 | 29.116 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 62.5M | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.09 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.76 | 28.96 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.10 | 27.73 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.34 | -10.38 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement