Ad is loading...
MCDFX vs TCELX
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs TCELX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$10.63
Change-$0.04 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.15M
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. TCELX (40.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than TCELX: MCDFX (3.57) vs TCELX (1.35). MCDFX was incepted earlier than TCELX: MCDFX (15 years) vs TCELX (5 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX (2500) and TCELX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.75 vs. TCELX (6.38). TCELX return over 5 years is better than : 3.74 vs. MCDFX (-2.73).
| MCDFX | TCELX | MCDFX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 2.67 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.826 | 0.465 | 1,038% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 40.1M | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.35 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.75 | 6.38 | 419% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.04 | -10.84 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.73 | 3.74 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...