MCDIF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
WLGS
Price
$2.03
Change
-$0.30 (-12.88%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

MCDIF vs WLGS

Header iconMCDIF vs WLGS Comparison
Open Charts MCDIF vs WLGSBanner chart's image
McDermott International
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
Wang & Lee Group
Price$2.03
Change-$0.30 (-12.88%)
Volume$724
CapitalizationN/A
MCDIF vs WLGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCDIF vs. WLGS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDIF is a Hold and WLGS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MCDIF: $0.12 vs. WLGS: $2.03)
Brand notoriety: MCDIF and WLGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCDIF: 0% vs. WLGS: 43%
Market capitalization -- MCDIF: $0 vs. WLGS: $35.17M
MCDIF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $0. WLGS’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $35.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCDIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCDIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MCDIF and WLGS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCDIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCDIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCDIF is a better buy in the short-term than WLGS.

Price Growth

MCDIF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -14.29% price change this week, while WLGS (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -27.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

WLGS is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.81% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLGS YTD gains are higher at: 183.916 vs. MCDIF (33.333).
MCDIFWLGSMCDIF / WLGS
CapitalizationN/A35.2M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.333183.91618%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDIFWLGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REFI15.76-0.33
-2.05%
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance
OTLK1.40-0.04
-2.78%
Outlook Therapeutics
KMI25.83-0.78
-2.93%
Kinder Morgan
IDA108.79-3.33
-2.97%
IDACORP
ELME15.35-0.55
-3.46%
Elme Communities

MCDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCDIF and EKIVY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCDIF and EKIVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCDIF
1D Price
Change %
MCDIF100%
-14.29%
EKIVY - MCDIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLND - MCDIF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
OPMXF - MCDIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.71%
WLGS - MCDIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-17.67%
GNSPF - MCDIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLGS and AGX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLGS and AGX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLGS
1D Price
Change %
WLGS100%
-12.88%
AGX - WLGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
ACSAF - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVEE - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
MTRX - WLGS
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.04%
ACA - WLGS
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.64%
More