Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCECX vs RNWBX
MCECX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCECX vs RNWBX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets C
Price$14.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.87M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.97
Change+$0.63 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.38B
MCECX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCECX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCECX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. MCECX (283M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than MCECX: RNWBX (0.13) vs MCECX (0.00). MCECX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCECX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). MCECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCECX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCECX: RNWBX (250) vs MCECX (1000). MCECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. RNWBX (14.06). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.44 vs. MCECX (2.21).
| MCECX | RNWBX | MCECX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.67 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.67 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.746 | 18.246 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 71.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.46 | 14.06 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.64 | 40.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.21 | 21.44 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement