Ad is loading...
MCECX vs RNWFX
MCECX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts MCECX vs RNWFX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets C
Price$12.44
Change+$0.15 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.22M
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.12
Change+$0.87 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.47B
MCECX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCECX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCECX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 61.5B vs. MCECX (305M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than MCECX: RNWFX (1.17) vs MCECX (0.00). MCECX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: MCECX (7 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). MCECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCECX (19.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCECX: RNWFX (250) vs MCECX (1000). MCECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.24 vs. RNWFX (2.81). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. MCECX (15.11).
| MCECX | RNWFX | MCECX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.62 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.62 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.319 | 2.407 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 61.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 2.81 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.82 | 13.54 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.11 | 40.31 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers