Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWBX
MCEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWBX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$14.36
Change+$0.11 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.98M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.22
Change+$0.87 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
MCEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. MCEMX (322M). MCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCEMX (0.57) vs RNWBX (0.13). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCEMX (0.83). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWBX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. RNWBX (10.04). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.16 vs. MCEMX (20.18).
| MCEMX | RNWBX | MCEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.67 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.67 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.454 | 14.507 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.13 | 426% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.56 | 10.04 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 32.68 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.18 | 30.16 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.45 | 60.47 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement