MCFNF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
37.4M
OKMN
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
24.96M
Ad is loading...

MCFNF vs OKMN

Header iconMCFNF vs OKMN Comparison
Open Charts MCFNF vs OKMNBanner chart's image
MCF ENERGY
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$69.67K
Capitalization37.4M
OKMIN RESOURCES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization24.96M
MCFNF vs OKMN Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCFNF vs. OKMN commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFNF is a Hold and OKMN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (MCFNF: $0.06 vs. OKMN: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: MCFNF and OKMN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCFNF: 40% vs. OKMN: 57%
Market capitalization -- MCFNF: $37.4M vs. OKMN: $24.96M
MCFNF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $37.4M. OKMN’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $24.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCFNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOKMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCFNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OKMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OKMN is a better buy in the long-term than MCFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCFNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MCFNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MCFNF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.70% price change this week, while OKMN (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCFNF($37.4M) has a higher market cap than OKMN($25M). MCFNF YTD gains are higher at: 59.366 vs. OKMN (20.000). OKMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -518.49K vs. MCFNF (-3.94M). MCFNF has more cash in the bank: 3.96M vs. OKMN (293K). OKMN has less debt than MCFNF: OKMN (182K) vs MCFNF (2.65M). OKMN has higher revenues than MCFNF: OKMN (139K) vs MCFNF (0).
MCFNFOKMNMCFNF / OKMN
Capitalization37.4M25M150%
EBITDA-3.94M-518.49K760%
Gain YTD59.36620.000297%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0139K-
Total Cash3.96M293K1,352%
Total Debt2.65M182K1,458%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPUS117.09-1.25
-1.06%
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF
YXI11.49-0.16
-1.42%
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
FNCL71.77-1.08
-1.48%
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF
CCRV20.52-0.32
-1.54%
iShares® Commodity Curve Carry Strat ETF
SPD33.95-0.74
-2.12%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF

MCFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCFNF and GRNT have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCFNF and GRNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCFNF
1D Price
Change %
MCFNF100%
+1.32%
GRNT - MCFNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.37%
AKRBF - MCFNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTS - MCFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
OKMN - MCFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEEVF - MCFNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OKMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OKMN and TXO have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OKMN and TXO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OKMN
1D Price
Change %
OKMN100%
N/A
TXO - OKMN
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CECAF - OKMN
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.21%
MCFNF - OKMN
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
CEIEF - OKMN
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KWTEF - OKMN
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More