MCFNF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
37.4M
VTS
Price
$21.50
Change
+$0.57 (+2.72%)
Updated
Jun 2, 04:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
698.94M
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCFNF vs VTS

Header iconMCFNF vs VTS Comparison
Open Charts MCFNF vs VTSBanner chart's image
MCF ENERGY
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$188.97K
Capitalization37.4M
Vitesse Energy
Price$21.50
Change+$0.57 (+2.72%)
Volume$102
Capitalization698.94M
MCFNF vs VTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCFNF vs. VTS commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFNF is a Hold and VTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (MCFNF: $0.03 vs. VTS: $20.93)
Brand notoriety: MCFNF and VTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCFNF: 245% vs. VTS: 80%
Market capitalization -- MCFNF: $37.4M vs. VTS: $698.94M
MCFNF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $37.4M. VTS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $698.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCFNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCFNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VTS is a better buy in the long-term than MCFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCFNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCFNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCFNF and VTS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCFNF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -14.17% price change this week, while VTS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

VTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.67% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTS($699M) has a higher market cap than MCFNF($37.4M). MCFNF YTD gains are higher at: -9.222 vs. VTS (-14.266). VTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 129M vs. MCFNF (-3.94M). MCFNF has more cash in the bank: 3.96M vs. VTS (552K). MCFNF has less debt than VTS: MCFNF (2.65M) vs VTS (84.3M). VTS has higher revenues than MCFNF: VTS (234M) vs MCFNF (0).
MCFNFVTSMCFNF / VTS
Capitalization37.4M699M5%
EBITDA-3.94M129M-3%
Gain YTD-9.222-14.26665%
P/E RatioN/A7.35-
Revenue0234M-
Total Cash3.96M552K718%
Total Debt2.65M84.3M3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCFNFVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIHAX38.300.03
+0.08%
Vanguard Intl Hi Div Yld Adm
BGALX16.65N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities 4
MICIX9.21-0.01
-0.11%
Victory Trivalent Intl Fd-Core Eq I
MNDCX14.54-0.05
-0.34%
MFS New Discovery C
FSMBX15.32-0.09
-0.58%
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Instl Plus

MCFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCFNF and GRNT have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCFNF and GRNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCFNF
1D Price
Change %
MCFNF100%
-7.35%
GRNT - MCFNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
AKRBF - MCFNF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
VTS - MCFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
OKMN - MCFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEEVF - MCFNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTS has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTS jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VTS
1D Price
Change %
VTS100%
-1.97%
CHRD - VTS
78%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
NOG - VTS
78%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
MTDR - VTS
78%
Closely correlated
-2.34%
PR - VTS
78%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
OVV - VTS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
More