Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAFX
MCGFX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAFX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.81
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.32
Change+$0.21 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
MCGFX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MCGFX (212M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAFX (0.55) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAFX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. MCGFX (6.75). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. MCGFX (-37.68).
| MCGFX | RGAFX | MCGFX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.34 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.34 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.644 | 15.990 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 18.84 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 61.27 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.68 | 43.89 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.33 | 102.47 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement