Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAHX
MCGFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAHX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.2M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.22
Change+$0.62 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
MCGFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MCGFX (207M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAHX (0.46) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAHX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.06 vs. MCGFX (4.46). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.38 vs. MCGFX (-37.42).
| MCGFX | RGAHX | MCGFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.44 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.44 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.990 | 17.919 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 17.06 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.83 | 62.47 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.42 | 46.38 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement