Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGIX vs RGAHX
MCGIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MCGIX vs RGAHX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth I
Price$14.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$85.18
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
MCGIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGIX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. MCGIX (200M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MCGIX: RGAHX (0.44) vs MCGIX (0.00). MCGIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MCGIX (29 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). MCGIX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGIX: RGAHX (250) vs MCGIX (100000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. MCGIX (2.66). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.78 vs. MCGIX (-38.89).
| MCGIX | RGAHX | MCGIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.44 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.44 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.312 | 15.986 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 7.06 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.36 | 63.22 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.89 | 34.78 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.55 | 89.07 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement