Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCH vs MCHS
MCH vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts MCH vs MCHS
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$24.65
Change+$0.26 (+1.07%)
Volume$100
Net Assets20.86M
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$29.63
Change+$0.27 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.38M
MCH vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCH vs. MCHS commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCH is a StrongBuy and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCH has more net assets: 20.9M vs. MCHS (2.38M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH: MCHS (15.191) vs MCH (10.590). MCH was incepted earlier than MCHS: MCH (3 years) vs MCHS (1 year). MCH (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover MCH (55.22) vs MCH (55.22).
| MCH | MCHS | MCH / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.590 | 15.191 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 20.9M | 2.38M | 880% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Turnover | 55.22 | 115.31 | 48% |
| Yield | 1.18 | 4.86 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCH | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| QFIN - MCH | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | +7.66% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | +5.18% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.38% |