Intraday BUY SELL Signals
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHS vs YMM
MCHS vs YMM Comparison
Open Charts MCHS vs YMM
MCHS vs YMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHS vs. YMM commentary
Oct 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHS is a Hold and YMM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHS | YMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BAI | 47.80 | 0.61 | +1.29% |
| iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | |||
| IGE | 62.32 | 0.69 | +1.12% |
| iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) | |||
| PHDG | 41.34 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) | |||
| HBRD | 23.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) | |||
| GDMN | 82.30 | -0.71 | -0.86% |
| WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with ACMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then ACMR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 33% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| AAOI - MCHS | 29% Poorly correlated | +8.12% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| NTES - MCHS | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||
YMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YMM has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YMM jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMM | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| BILI - YMM | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| TUYA - YMM | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| NTES - YMM | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| GRAB - YMM | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| RIOT - YMM | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
More | ||||