Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHFX vs TRCLX
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCHFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Investor
Price$16.91
Change+$0.22 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.14M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.35
Change+$0.11 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.76M
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 400M vs. TRCLX (59.8M). MCHFX (1.62) and TRCLX (1.56) have matching dividends . MCHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCHFX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCHFX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.61 vs. TRCLX (42.94). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.52 vs. MCHFX (-31.68).
| MCHFX | TRCLX | MCHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.03 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.10 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.182 | 25.379 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 400M | 59.8M | 669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.56 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.61 | 42.94 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.45 | 13.47 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.68 | -6.52 | 486% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers