Ad is loading...
MCHFX vs TRCLX
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCHFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Investor
Price$13.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.43M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.45
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40M
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. TRCLX (40M). MCHFX (1.73) and TRCLX (1.68) have matching dividends . MCHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCHFX (27 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.15). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCHFX (49.60). MCHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCHFX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.61 vs. TRCLX (4.00). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 2.29 vs. MCHFX (-26.21).
| MCHFX | TRCLX | MCHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.03 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 2.10 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.521 | -1.042 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 392M | 40M | 980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.68 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.61 | 4.00 | 590% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.80 | -11.64 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.21 | 2.29 | -1,142% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...