Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHFX vs TRCLX
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCHFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.35
Change-$0.10 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.45M
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHFX is a StrongBuy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 456M vs. TRCLX (60.4M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MCHFX (1.42) vs TRCLX (1.34). MCHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCHFX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCHFX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.79 vs. MCHFX (25.05). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -12.31 vs. MCHFX (-33.55).
| MCHFX | TRCLX | MCHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.03 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.10 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.307 | 27.367 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 60.4M | 755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.34 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.05 | 26.79 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.06 | 29.30 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.55 | -12.31 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers