Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHFX vs TRCLX
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCHFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Investor
Price$18.49
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.7M
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 475M vs. TRCLX (66.7M). MCHFX (1.39) and TRCLX (1.34) have matching dividends . MCHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCHFX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCHFX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCHFX (19.60) and TRCLX (18.81) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.52 vs. MCHFX (-24.21).
| MCHFX | TRCLX | MCHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.03 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.10 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.649 | 33.049 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 475M | 66.7M | 712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.34 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.60 | 18.81 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.33 | 33.99 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.21 | 0.52 | -4,686% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers