MCHHF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
604.24M
NICMF
Price
$0.48
Change
-$0.02 (-4.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHHF vs NICMF

Header iconMCHHF vs NICMF Comparison
Open Charts MCHHF vs NICMFBanner chart's image
MacMahon Holdings
Price$0.30
Change-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Volume$500
Capitalization604.24M
Nickel Industries
Price$0.48
Change-$0.02 (-4.00%)
Volume$6.81K
Capitalization2.08B
MCHHF vs NICMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NICMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHHF vs. NICMF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHHF is a Hold and NICMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHHF: $0.30 vs. NICMF: $0.48)
Brand notoriety: MCHHF and NICMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHHF: 20% vs. NICMF: 251%
Market capitalization -- MCHHF: $604.24M vs. NICMF: $2.08B
MCHHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $604.24M. NICMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNICMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NICMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHHF is a better buy in the long-term than NICMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NICMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NICMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NICMF is a better buy in the short-term than MCHHF.

Price Growth

MCHHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.25% price change this week, while NICMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NICMF($2.08B) has a higher market cap than MCHHF($604M). NICMF has higher P/E ratio than MCHHF: NICMF (17.88) vs MCHHF (13.22). MCHHF YTD gains are higher at: 37.112 vs. NICMF (-4.671). MCHHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 359M vs. NICMF (77.8M). MCHHF has more cash in the bank: 264M vs. NICMF (211M). MCHHF has less debt than NICMF: MCHHF (426M) vs NICMF (1.06B). MCHHF has higher revenues than NICMF: MCHHF (2.43B) vs NICMF (1.73B).
MCHHFNICMFMCHHF / NICMF
Capitalization604M2.08B29%
EBITDA359M77.8M461%
Gain YTD37.112-4.671-794%
P/E Ratio13.2217.8874%
Revenue2.43B1.73B140%
Total Cash264M211M125%
Total Debt426M1.06B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHHF: Fundamental Ratings
MCHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHHFNICMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NICMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEOHX18.53N/A
N/A
Voya Large Cap Growth Port I
GRZZX5.09N/A
N/A
Leuthold Grizzly Short Fund
REMAX20.35N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Emerging Markets A
VGIAX115.91N/A
N/A
Vanguard Growth & Income Adm
FRMPX29.48N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opp A

MCHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHHF and AOTVF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHHF and AOTVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHHF
1D Price
Change %
MCHHF100%
-3.97%
AOTVF - MCHHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
NICMF - MCHHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGXXF - MCHHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
GRSLF - MCHHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+9.95%
PXCLF - MCHHF
0%
Poorly correlated
+99.00%
More

NICMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NICMF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NICMF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NICMF
1D Price
Change %
NICMF100%
N/A
PILBF - NICMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
ILKAY - NICMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
CRECF - NICMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+11.26%
MALRY - NICMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
PMETF - NICMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
More