MCLE
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.04 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.4M
MCSHF
Price
$2.18
Change
+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCLE vs MCSHF

Header iconMCLE vs MCSHF Comparison
Open Charts MCLE vs MCSHFBanner chart's image
MEDICALE
Price$0.16
Change-$0.04 (-20.00%)
Volume$350
Capitalization7.4M
Metcash
Price$2.18
Change+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.34B
MCLE vs MCSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCLE vs. MCSHF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCLE is a Hold and MCSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MCLE: $0.16 vs. MCSHF: $2.18)
Brand notoriety: MCLE and MCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCLE: 22% vs. MCSHF: 1%
Market capitalization -- MCLE: $7.4M vs. MCSHF: $2.34B
MCLE [@Food Distributors] is valued at $7.4M. MCSHF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCLE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCLE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MCLE and MCSHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

MCLE (@Food Distributors) experienced а +8.00% price change this week, while MCSHF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+2.79% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSHF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than MCLE($7.4M). MCSHF YTD gains are higher at: -1.580 vs. MCLE (-14.737). MCSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 558M vs. MCLE (-37.12K). MCSHF has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. MCLE (159). MCSHF has higher revenues than MCLE: MCSHF (15.8B) vs MCLE (0).
MCLEMCSHFMCLE / MCSHF
Capitalization7.4M2.34B0%
EBITDA-37.12K558M-0%
Gain YTD-14.737-1.580933%
P/E RatioN/A13.61-
Revenue015.8B-
Total Cash159107M0%
Total DebtN/A1.32B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
MCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVRRX81.801.20
+1.49%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R5
RYVCX142.82N/A
N/A
Rydex Energy Services C
FDTZX23.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development M
HILVX22.47N/A
N/A
Harbor Large Cap Value Inv
GPEIX12.78N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak Emerg Mkts Opps Instl

MCLE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCLE and JRONY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCLE and JRONY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCLE
1D Price
Change %
MCLE100%
-17.86%
JRONY - MCLE
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
KARNF - MCLE
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CERGF - MCLE
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSHXF - MCLE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCSHF - MCLE
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCSHF and CERGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCSHF and CERGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCSHF
1D Price
Change %
MCSHF100%
N/A
CERGF - MCSHF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
OGOFF - MCSHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTWF - MCSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More