MCLE
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
MCSHF
Price
$2.21
Change
-$0.34 (-13.33%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

MCLE vs MCSHF

Header iconMCLE vs MCSHF Comparison
Open Charts MCLE vs MCSHFBanner chart's image
MEDICALE
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.68K
CapitalizationN/A
Metcash
Price$2.21
Change-$0.34 (-13.33%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
MCLE vs MCSHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCLE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCLE vs. MCSHF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCLE is a Hold and MCSHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (MCLE: $0.26 vs. MCSHF: $2.21)
Brand notoriety: MCLE and MCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCLE: 385% vs. MCSHF: 25%
Market capitalization -- MCLE: $7.4M vs. MCSHF: $2.34B
MCLE [@Food Distributors] is valued at $7.4M. MCSHF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCLE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCLE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MCLE and MCSHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCLE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCSHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCLE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCSHF is a better buy in the short-term than MCLE.

Price Growth

MCLE (@Food Distributors) experienced а +5.80% price change this week, while MCSHF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.63% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSHF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than MCLE($7.4M). MCLE YTD gains are higher at: 73.333 vs. MCSHF (-3.696). MCSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 558M vs. MCLE (-37.12K). MCSHF has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. MCLE (159). MCSHF has higher revenues than MCLE: MCSHF (15.8B) vs MCLE (0).
MCLEMCSHFMCLE / MCSHF
Capitalization7.4M2.34B0%
EBITDA-37.12K558M-0%
Gain YTD73.333-3.696-1,984%
P/E RatioN/A13.61-
Revenue015.8B-
Total Cash159107M0%
Total DebtN/A1.32B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
MCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCLEMCSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCLE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRMTX10.980.16
+1.48%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S2
ALVGX10.060.09
+0.90%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val R5
BRSJX14.870.13
+0.88%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq I
VWIAX59.870.31
+0.52%
Vanguard Wellesley® Income Admiral™
PAAOX15.450.05
+0.32%
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Advisor

MCLE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCLE and JRONY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCLE and JRONY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCLE
1D Price
Change %
MCLE100%
N/A
JRONY - MCLE
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
KARNF - MCLE
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CERGF - MCLE
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSHXF - MCLE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCSHF - MCLE
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCSHF and CERGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCSHF and CERGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCSHF
1D Price
Change %
MCSHF100%
N/A
CERGF - MCSHF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
OGOFF - MCSHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTWF - MCSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More