MCO vs RILYL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCO is a Hold and RILYL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRILYL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RILYL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MCO (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while RILYL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +10.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +133.04%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
MCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.61% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Conglomerates (+3.28% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| MCO | RILYL | MCO / RILYL | |
| Capitalization | 71.9B | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | 2.49B | 133K | 1,869,925% |
| Gain YTD | -10.079 | -47.967 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 45.12 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.73B | 1.56B | 368% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.27B | 2.28B | 319% |
MCO | RILYL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RILYL's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCO (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that RILYL’s stock grew significantly faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for RILYL (100) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew significantly faster than RILYL’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's SMR Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for RILYL (100) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew significantly faster than RILYL’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RILYL (96) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RILYL’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RILYL (100) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RILYL’s over the last 12 months.
| MCO | RILYL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | about 1 month ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | about 1 month ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | N/A |
MCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| SPGI - MCO | 87% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| NDAQ - MCO | 74% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MORN - MCO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| JEF - MCO | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| GS - MCO | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||
RILYL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RILYL has been closely correlated with RILYP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RILYL jumps, then RILYP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RILYL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RILYL | 100% | +2.24% | ||
| RILYP - RILYL | 90% Closely correlated | +8.42% | ||
| RILY - RILYL | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| MCO - RILYL | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| APLD - RILYL | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
| DFIN - RILYL | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.10% | ||
More | ||||