MCOIF vs MHSDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCOIF is a Hold and MHSDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCOIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMHSDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MCOIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MHSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MHSDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MHSDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
MCOIF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MHSDF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.94%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (+0.66% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| MCOIF | MHSDF | MCOIF / MHSDF | |
| Capitalization | 2.14B | 6.42B | 33% |
| EBITDA | 2.38B | 7.41B | 32% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 40.00 | 24.63 | 162% |
| Revenue | 59.1B | 27.7B | 213% |
| Total Cash | 7.54B | 1.65B | 458% |
| Total Debt | 21.5B | 4.28B | 503% |
MCOIF | MHSDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MHSDF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MCOIF (9). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to MCOIF’s over the last 12 months.
MHSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MCOIF (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to MCOIF’s over the last 12 months.
MHSDF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MCOIF (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to MCOIF’s over the last 12 months.
MCOIF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHSDF (86). This means that MCOIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHSDF’s over the last 12 months.
MCOIF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MHSDF (81). This means that MCOIF’s stock grew significantly faster than MHSDF’s over the last 12 months.
| MCOIF | MHSDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 35% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 32% | 16 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 38% | 16 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MCOIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCOIF and ATVDY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCOIF and ATVDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCOIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCOIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ATVDY - MCOIF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CEVMF - MCOIF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OAMCF - MCOIF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
| MHSDF - MCOIF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QYOUF - MCOIF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MHSDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHSDF and MCOIF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHSDF and MCOIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHSDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHSDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MCOIF - MHSDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QYOUF - MHSDF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THBRF - MHSDF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.01% | ||
| UMGP - MHSDF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VIVHY - MHSDF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||