MCQEF
Price
$147.76
Change
+$5.76 (+4.06%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
NRSCF
Price
$6.11
Change
+$0.18 (+3.04%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

MCQEF vs NRSCF

Header iconMCQEF vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts MCQEF vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Macquarie Group
Price$147.76
Change+$5.76 (+4.06%)
Volume$103
CapitalizationN/A
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.11
Change+$0.18 (+3.04%)
Volume$162
CapitalizationN/A
MCQEF vs NRSCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCQEF vs. NRSCF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCQEF is a Hold and NRSCF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (MCQEF: $147.76 vs. NRSCF: $6.11)
Brand notoriety: MCQEF and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCQEF: 40% vs. NRSCF: 1%
Market capitalization -- MCQEF: $45.69B vs. NRSCF: $12.83B
MCQEF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $45.69B. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCQEF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCQEF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MCQEF and NRSCF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCQEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCQEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the short-term than MCQEF.

Price Growth

MCQEF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.06% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.56% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCQEF($45.7B) has a higher market cap than NRSCF($12.8B). NRSCF has higher P/E ratio than MCQEF: NRSCF (18.52) vs MCQEF (13.00). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 38.549 vs. MCQEF (17.739). MCQEF has less debt than NRSCF: MCQEF (245B) vs NRSCF (11.4T). NRSCF has higher revenues than MCQEF: NRSCF (1.12T) vs MCQEF (6.56B).
MCQEFNRSCFMCQEF / NRSCF
Capitalization45.7B12.8B357%
EBITDA14.8BN/A-
Gain YTD17.73938.54946%
P/E Ratio13.0018.5270%
Revenue6.56B1.12T1%
Total Cash87.8BN/A-
Total Debt245B11.4T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCQEF vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
MCQEF
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3360
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2596
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRSCF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCQEF (73). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (60). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MCQEF (7). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MCQEF (52). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NRSCF (96). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew significantly faster than NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCQEFNRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFFD19.760.11
+0.56%
Global X US Preferred ETF
CSF55.040.23
+0.43%
VictoryShares US Discv Enh Vol Wtd ETF
TFPN25.140.02
+0.08%
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asst Trnd ETF
HTAB19.37-0.04
-0.21%
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
FDWM23.21-0.48
-2.01%
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF

MCQEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCQEF and ASXFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCQEF and ASXFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCQEF
1D Price
Change %
MCQEF100%
N/A
ASXFF - MCQEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - MCQEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+13.51%
CMSQF - MCQEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MQBKY - MCQEF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
OSCUF - MCQEF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.97%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and NMR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
NMR - NRSCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
CCORF - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
MQBKY - NRSCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
MCQEF - NRSCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - NRSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+13.51%
More