MCQEF
Price
$141.94
Change
-$1.40 (-0.98%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
55.51B
OSCUF
Price
$11.28
Change
+$1.47 (+15.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCQEF vs OSCUF

Header iconMCQEF vs OSCUF Comparison
Open Charts MCQEF vs OSCUFBanner chart's image
Macquarie Group
Price$141.94
Change-$1.40 (-0.98%)
Volume$144
Capitalization55.51B
Japan Exchange Group
Price$11.28
Change+$1.47 (+15.00%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization10.95B
MCQEF vs OSCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCQEF vs. OSCUF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCQEF is a StrongBuy and OSCUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MCQEF: $141.94 vs. OSCUF: $11.27)
Brand notoriety: MCQEF and OSCUF are both not notable
MCQEF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while OSCUF is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCQEF: 29% vs. OSCUF: 93%
Market capitalization -- MCQEF: $55.51B vs. OSCUF: $10.95B
MCQEF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $55.51B. OSCUF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $10.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $168.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.33B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCQEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOSCUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCQEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OSCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCQEF is a better buy in the long-term than OSCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCQEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSCUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCQEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OSCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSCUF is a better buy in the short-term than MCQEF.

Price Growth

MCQEF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while OSCUF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +5.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.48%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.31% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.03% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCQEF($55.5B) has a higher market cap than OSCUF($10.9B). OSCUF has higher P/E ratio than MCQEF: OSCUF (28.27) vs MCQEF (22.44). MCQEF YTD gains are higher at: 5.519 vs. OSCUF (-9.073). OSCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109B vs. MCQEF (20.5B). OSCUF has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. MCQEF (88B). OSCUF has less debt than MCQEF: OSCUF (52.5B) vs MCQEF (330B). OSCUF has higher revenues than MCQEF: OSCUF (164B) vs MCQEF (6.79B).
MCQEFOSCUFMCQEF / OSCUF
Capitalization55.5B10.9B509%
EBITDA20.5B109B19%
Gain YTD5.519-9.073-61%
P/E Ratio22.4428.2779%
Revenue6.79B164B4%
Total Cash88B255B35%
Total Debt330B52.5B629%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCQEF vs OSCUF: Fundamental Ratings
MCQEF
OSCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
826
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5039

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCQEF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (87). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (100). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (26). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OSCUF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MCQEF (57). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew similarly to MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (59). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCQEFOSCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSME1.740.51
+41.46%
VS Media Holdings Limited
UP3.000.61
+25.52%
Wheels Up Experience
BRDG9.510.02
+0.21%
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
POOL318.38-3.05
-0.95%
Pool Corp
SBEV1.85-0.11
-5.61%
Splash Beverage Group

MCQEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCQEF and ASXFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCQEF and ASXFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCQEF
1D Price
Change %
MCQEF100%
N/A
ASXFF - MCQEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - MCQEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
CMSQF - MCQEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MQBKY - MCQEF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
OSCUF - MCQEF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OSCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSCUF and DSEEY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSCUF and DSEEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSCUF
1D Price
Change %
OSCUF100%
N/A
DSEEY - OSCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
JPXGY - OSCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
HKXCF - OSCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.79%
MCQEF - OSCUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZSTF - OSCUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More