Ad is loading...
MCSPX vs NAESX
MCSPX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MCSPX vs NAESX
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv C
Price$10.28
Change+$0.14 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets408.5M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$100.96
Change+$1.49 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
MCSPX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSPX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSPX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. MCSPX (408M). MCSPX pays higher dividends than NAESX: MCSPX (1.54) vs NAESX (1.39). MCSPX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MCSPX (31 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MCSPX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MCSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). MCSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MCSPX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.88 vs. MCSPX (-7.09). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.04 vs. MCSPX (-31.92).
| MCSPX | NAESX | MCSPX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.17 | 871% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.17 | 1,153% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.407 | -13.542 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 408M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.39 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.09 | -3.88 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.74 | 3.78 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.92 | 69.04 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.69 | 74.33 | -72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...