Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSPX vs NAESX
MCSPX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MCSPX vs NAESX
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv C
Price$11.48
Change+$0.16 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.05M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
MCSPX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSPX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSPX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MCSPX (449M). MCSPX pays higher dividends than NAESX: MCSPX (1.49) vs NAESX (1.35). MCSPX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MCSPX (31 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MCSPX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MCSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MCSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MCSPX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. MCSPX (2.89). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. MCSPX (-33.54).
| MCSPX | NAESX | MCSPX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.17 | 871% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.17 | 1,153% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.330 | -4.086 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 449M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.35 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | 5.13 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.04 | 16.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.54 | 52.20 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.76 | 96.08 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement