Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSPX vs NAESX
MCSPX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MCSPX vs NAESX
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv C
Price$11.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets498.36M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.36
Change-$0.15 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
MCSPX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSPX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSPX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. MCSPX (498M). MCSPX pays higher dividends than NAESX: MCSPX (1.35) vs NAESX (1.20). MCSPX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MCSPX (31 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MCSPX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MCSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MCSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MCSPX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.47 vs. MCSPX (2.38). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.22 vs. MCSPX (-33.76).
| MCSPX | NAESX | MCSPX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.17 | 871% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.683 | 6.555 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 498M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 10.47 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.83 | 39.00 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.76 | 66.22 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.53 | 132.70 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement