Ad is loading...
MCSSX vs RWMFX
MCSSX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts MCSSX vs RWMFX
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Investor Class
Price$37.78
Change-$0.82 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.33M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$58.07
Change-$1.68 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.96B
MCSSX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSSX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSSX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. MCSSX (507M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: RWMFX (1.53) vs MCSSX (0.00). MCSSX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: MCSSX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). MCSSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MCSSX (7.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: RWMFX (250) vs MCSSX (1000). MCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. RWMFX (-0.11). MCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 78.90 vs. RWMFX (56.08).
| MCSSX | RWMFX | MCSSX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.631 | -2.504 | 25% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 507M | 181B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | -0.11 | -3,006% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.51 | 6.24 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.90 | 56.08 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.14 | 54.24 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...