Ad is loading...
MCSSX vs VTSAX
MCSSX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts MCSSX vs VTSAX
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Investor Class
Price$38.97
Change+$0.63 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets502.7M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$130.93
Change+$2.66 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
MCSSX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSSX vs. VTSAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSSX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. MCSSX (503M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: VTSAX (1.35) vs MCSSX (0.00). MCSSX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: MCSSX (17 years) vs VTSAX (24 years). MCSSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). MCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). MCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: MCSSX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). MCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. VTSAX (5.27). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 86.80 vs. MCSSX (79.79).
| MCSSX | VTSAX | MCSSX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.04 | 2,925% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.04 | 2,925% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.499 | -9.019 | -28% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 503M | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 5.27 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.50 | 22.59 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.79 | 86.80 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.87 | 150.71 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...