Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCTDX vs RLBCX
MCTDX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. MCTDX (85M). MCTDX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MCTDX (11.46) vs RLBCX (1.56). MCTDX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MCTDX (4 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MCTDX (4.10) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MCTDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 916.24 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCTDX: RLBCX (250) vs MCTDX (10000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. MCTDX (9.13).
| MCTDX | RLBCX | MCTDX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 0.89 | 339% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.10 | 0.89 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.000 | 8.712 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.46 | 1.56 | 737% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 9.77 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.34 | 30.66 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 35.23 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement