Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$18.96
Change+$0.23 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets974.4M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.96
Change+$0.52 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.55B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.55B vs. MCVSX (974M). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.17) vs SSGSX (0.52). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.66 vs. MCVSX (-24.18). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.79 vs. MCVSX (-17.62).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.511 | -8.594 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 974M | 5.55B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.52 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.18 | -9.66 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | -37.75 | -12.89 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.62 | 8.79 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.07 | 8.65 | -440% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement