Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$21.46
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.99
Change-$0.08 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. MCVSX (1.05B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.06) vs SSGSX (0.48). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.40 vs. MCVSX (-16.77). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.15 vs. MCVSX (-3.94).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.676 | 1.378 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 5.52B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.48 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.77 | -4.40 | 381% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.54 | 7.68 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.94 | 22.15 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.23 | 20.72 | -122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers