Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$19.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. MCVSX (1.01B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.17) vs SSGSX (0.52). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.86 vs. MCVSX (-20.54). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.23 vs. MCVSX (0.31).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.262 | -5.600 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 5.64B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.52 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.54 | -4.86 | 422% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.55 | -1.23 | 2,167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.31 | 29.23 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.24 | 11.93 | -295% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement