Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$20.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.7B vs. MCVSX (1.01B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.15) vs SSGSX (0.51). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.42 vs. MCVSX (-23.90). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.62 vs. MCVSX (-3.87).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.536 | -2.972 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 5.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.51 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.90 | -9.42 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.73 | -2.83 | 910% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.87 | 22.62 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.04 | 17.56 | -171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers