Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$20.72
Change-$0.22 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.97
Change-$0.65 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. MCVSX (1.04B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.13) vs SSGSX (0.50). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.24 vs. MCVSX (-14.97). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.76 vs. MCVSX (-7.05).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.048 | 0.409 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 5.64B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.50 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.97 | -1.24 | 1,207% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.69 | -6.85 | 434% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.05 | 18.76 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.80 | 17.45 | -165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement