Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$20.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.39M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. MCVSX (983M). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.07) vs SSGSX (0.49). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (15 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.94 vs. MCVSX (-23.95). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. MCVSX (-21.58).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.911 | -4.243 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 983M | 4.96B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.49 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.95 | -13.94 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.34 | -10.31 | 285% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.58 | 2.50 | -862% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.98 | 12.84 | -226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement