It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MCW is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
MCW | RUSHA | MCW / RUSHA | |
Capitalization | 1.88B | 4.29B | 44% |
EBITDA | 273M | 691M | 40% |
Gain YTD | -21.399 | 1.365 | -1,567% |
P/E Ratio | 22.04 | 15.72 | 140% |
Revenue | 1.03B | 7.78B | 13% |
Total Cash | 26.4M | 229M | 12% |
Total Debt | 1.79B | 1.73B | 103% |
RUSHA | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCW | RUSHA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 6 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago68% | 6 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 3 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with DRVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then DRVN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MCW | 100% | -0.35% | ||
DRVN - MCW | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
AN - MCW | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
PAG - MCW | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
RUSHA - MCW | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
ABG - MCW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHA | 100% | -0.07% | ||
RUSHB - RUSHA | 85% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
AN - RUSHA | 70% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
ABG - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
GPI - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
LAD - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More |