Advertisement
MCW vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCW is a Hold and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MCW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MCW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MCW (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -1.66% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -8.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -3.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
MCW is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (-3.88% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| MCW | RUSHA | MCW / RUSHA | |
| Capitalization | 1.75B | 4.23B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 273M | 682M | 40% |
| Gain YTD | -26.886 | -1.399 | 1,922% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.54 | 15.23 | 135% |
| Revenue | 1.03B | 7.69B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 26.4M | 211M | 13% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 1.75B | 102% |
RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MCW | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 67% | 9 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
MCW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with DRVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then DRVN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCW | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| DRVN - MCW | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| PAG - MCW | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| RUSHB - MCW | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| RUSHA - MCW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| CARG - MCW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 86% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 66% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||