Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYAX vs RNWBX
MCYAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYAX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl A
Price$13.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.19M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
MCYAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. MCYAX (126M). MCYAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCYAX (0.21) vs RNWBX (0.12). MCYAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYAX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCYAX (1.58). MCYAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCYAX: RNWBX (250) vs MCYAX (15000). MCYAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.40 vs. RNWBX (11.48). MCYAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.82 vs. RNWBX (25.41).
| MCYAX | RNWBX | MCYAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.681 | 23.671 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 126M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.12 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.40 | 11.48 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 54.43 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.82 | 25.41 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement